Weapons of mass destructions have many negative consequences. One Important consequent is the large numbers of killed humans. The negative cost and poverty are negative consequence because the weapons are very expensive. The cold war was the first example of use weapons of mass destructions. According to Wikipedia was the bombs had killed 140 000 persons in Hiroshima and 80 000 in Nagasaki. In Hiroshima the victims from 15% to 20% die from injuries or illness attributed to radiations poisoning. To conclude atomic bombs endangering the humans, animals and environment, everybody are in danger.
Weapons of mass destruction for me only have bad consecuences, have poverty, a lot of die people, contamination, and in any time can distroit all world
Soy una persona muy tranquila me gusta salir a bailar y conocer gente interesante . soy una persona analitica no me gustan q me mienta y que no me escuchen. Soy un buen amigo y no me gustan los problemas y los evito a lo maximo. Me gusta la musica electronica rock y mas . Parecos ser serio pero al conocerme soy todo lo contrario y sorprendente jejeje
Weapons o Mass Destructions
ResponderEliminarWeapons of mass destructions have many negative consequences. One Important consequent is the large numbers of killed humans. The negative cost and poverty are negative consequence because the weapons are very expensive. The cold war was the first example of use weapons of mass destructions. According to Wikipedia was the bombs had killed 140 000 persons in Hiroshima and 80 000 in Nagasaki. In Hiroshima the victims from 15% to 20% die from injuries or illness attributed to radiations poisoning. To conclude atomic bombs endangering the humans, animals and environment, everybody are in danger.
Poor handling of weapons of mass destruction, may cause the end of the world in a few seconds.
ResponderEliminarWeapons of mass destruction for me only have bad consecuences, have poverty, a lot of die people, contamination, and in any time can distroit all world
ResponderEliminar